| |

Engaging
in the trade war
By
ERNEST F. HOLLINGS, former U. S. senator
|

Hollings
|
APRIL 9,
2010 -- Apparently David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel decided to run the President
all out as a candidate for re-election his first term, finessing the immediate
need of jobs and the need to stop running deficits. They thought the President
could get by on jobs by stimulating like his Republican predecessor and
get by on deficits with a study commission. But time is of the essence.
The economy is in real trouble.
By the time President Obama moved to stimulate, President George W. Bush,
households, former Secretary Paulson, and the Federal Reserve had already
stimulated the economy $13.5 trillion, and we were losing 700,000 jobs
per month. Stimulation had spent. And Axelrod and Emanuel ignored the
real loss of jobs to off-shoring. Three years ago, the Princeton economist,
Alan Blinder, projected that for ten years the United States would be
losing on an average three to four million jobs a year to off-shoring.
Axelrod and Emanuel have the President furiously bailing out the sinking
boat of the economy with a jobs bill, but fail to plug the off-shore hole
in the bottom.
Democrats are politically vulnerable on defense, so Axelrod and Emanuel
thought they could insulate President Obama on this score by having him
proclaim the war in Afghanistan necessary. In the Muslim world, more important
than freedom and democracy is tribe and religion. Muslim politics responds
to religion, whereas in a democracy we have freedom of religion. Force
feeding democracy for eight years in Afghanistan, we are really trying
to force a change in culture. When we are done and gone, President Karzai
has got to live with the Afghans, and his antics against the United States
are for survival. We ought to realize after eight years that we are creating
more terrorism than democracy. The war in Afghanistan is not necessary.
On February 1st, President Obama submitted a budget with a deficit exceeding
$1 trillion each year for ten years. No one serious about being President
would submit such a budget. Today, every governor and state legislature,
every mayor and city council, is struggling to pay this year's bill. Businesses
have been struggling to pay their bills for two years running. Front and
center in the minds of the voters is paying bills and for Washington to
consider continually running deficits in excess of $1 trillion is shocking.
The people voted for change, and President Obama's study for a year is
a bitter disappointment.
|
"President
Obama can't get by four years keeping the country AWOL in the trade
war. He can't keep the government on a credit card for $1 trillion
a year. President Obama has met his Rubicon. Is he serious as a
candidate for contributions or is he serious about being President
of the country? Time is of the essence."
--
Ernest F. Hollings
|
Now with
health reform, hospitals are crying about cuts in payments; doctors about
Medicare cuts; States about Medicaid costs. The gathering storm. Cries
of a government takeover of the banks; a government takeover of the automobile
industry; a government takeover of communications; a government takeover
of energy; a government takeover of health care - every government takeover
you can think of except its responsibility under the Constitution to regulate
foreign commerce. Globalization is nothing more than a trade war with
production looking for a cheaper country to produce.
David Ricardo's "comparative advantage" of productivity in international
trade has been changed by China to government, and Washington government
needs to come in from the cold in the trade war and compete in globalization.
Corporate America with its investment, research and production in China
is draining the tub of manufacturing or middle-class jobs in America.
Long before President Obama's election, China had taken over a good bit
of our manufacture. And today, middle-class jobs hemorrhage off-shore.
President Obama has to change the politics of "against taxes and
getting rid of government" to taxes and a government industrial policy.
We have the makings of an industrial policy already. With devastating
deficits in the balance of trade, we can move like President Nixon in
1971 by instituting a 10% surcharge on imports. Under Section 201 of the
Trade Act we don't have to wait for industries like GM to go bankrupt,
but we can impose tariffs or quotas when production is endangered.
Our tax
laws now favor foreign production and should be changed to favor domestic
production. But with jobs and deficits at a critical stage, President
Obama should immediately propose a 5% value added tax to replace the corporate
income tax. A 2% VAT will more than replace the revenues lost from cancelling
the corporate tax. A 1% VAT will pay for the cost of health care, and
2% can be used to stop deficits. This is realistic and doable. Responding
to anti-tax members of Congress, a 5% VAT in place of the corporate income
tax eliminates business taxes with more revenues. The average corporate
income tax of 27% is replaced by a 5% sales tax. The cost of production
is reduced, reducing the cost of products to consumers. And the VAT rebateable
on exports reduces the cost of exports 27%. Small business will opt for
a 5% sales tax in place of its income tax in a "New York minute."
This will stem the tide of off-shoring jobs and start paying down deficits.
But the CEOs of Corporate America are not interested in coming back from
China and producing domestically for less profits. Wall Street, the big
banks, Corporate America, and their entities, like the Business Roundtable
and the U. S. Chamber of Commerce, will fight the President and Congress
to keep their off-shored profits flowing. This business crowd furnishes
the contributions for campaigns.
President Obama can't get by four years keeping the country AWOL in the
trade war. He can't keep the government on a credit card for $1 trillion
a year. President Obama has met his Rubicon. Is he serious as a candidate
for contributions or is he serious about being President of the country?
Time is of the essence.
Senator Hollings
of South Carolina served 38 years in the United States Senate, and for
many years was Chairman of the Commerce, Space, Science & Transportation
Committee. He is the author of the recently published book,
Making
Government Work (University of South Carolina Press, 2008).
© 2010,
Ernest F. Hollings. All rights reserved. Contact
us for republication permission.
|
About
Fritz Hollings
Ernest F. Hollings
served the public for 56 years -- 38 years in the United States Senate
and as South Carolina's governor, lieutenant governor and a member of
the S.C. House of Representatives.
Today, Hollings continues
to be influential in public affairs and offers this Web site as a compendium
of current and past positions on public issues. Learn
more about Fritz Hollings.
Receive
commentary by email
The
Hollings legacy
Click
here to learn more about Hollings' impressive and distinguished record of
public service.
|
2010
commentary
Previous
commentaries
|
Read
the new book
The
University of South Carolina Press in 2008 published Making
Government Work, a new book by Sen. Hollings. Learn
more.
|
|